• Contact
  • Feedback
Banking Day
Stay Ahead. Stay Informed.
Concise. Candid. Provocative.
Get the daily banking news that matters
Banking Day – Your trusted source for independent financial insights.
Subscribe Now
  • News
  • Topics
    • All Topics
    • Briefs
    • Major Banks
    • Authorised deposit-taking institutions
    • Insurance, funds and super
    • Payments, mobile & wallets
    • Consumer lending
    • Mortgages
    • Business lending
    • Finance regulation
    • Debt capital markets
    • Ratings agencies
    • Equity capital markets
    • Professional services
    • Work & career
    • Foreign news
    • Other topics
  • Free Trial
  • Subscribe
  • Resources
    • Industry events
  • About us
    • About Banking Day
    • Advertise
    • Feedback
    • Contact Banking Day
  • Search
  • Login
  • My account
    • Account settings
    • User Admin
    • Logout

Login or request a free trial

ACFS focuses on contract design

19 November 2010 5:24PM
The first major submission to the Senate's banking competition inquiry argues for limits on lenders' ability to change loan interest rates and exit fees, and for greater freedom for borrowers to transfer loans.The submission, from the Australian Centre for Financial Studies, was prepared by the centre's research director, Kevin Davis. It focuses on the mortgage contract, reasoning that the US sub-prime crisis has shown that badly designed mortgage contracts can create social and economic problems. Its key points:* Australian housing mortgage rates should not be variable at the lender's discretion. Home borrowers are unlikely to be able to anticipate the effects of future market disruptions, and it is more appropriate that those risks be borne by bank shareholders and managed by bank executives. "Adjustable rate loans where the rate is specified as a fixed margin over a variable market indicator rate for some period ... are one option," the submission says.* At re-negotiation dates, borrowers should be able to transfer a mortgage to another lender at minimum cost, as is the case in Canada.* Lenders should be banned from charging exit fees on housing loans at re-negotiation dates, once the loan is three years old.* Lenders should only be able to charge deferred loan establishment fees by explicitly adding them into the initial loan principal.Other submissions to the Senate inquiry so far, from members of the public, call for changes that include a new government-owned retail bank to  "some sort of common bank fees for all different accounts across the country [so] regulating different banks charging whatever they like to cover their expenses and still earn billions ... [in] profits."

I'm a returning subscriber

*
Password reset *
Login

Request a free trial

  • Emailing you the news at 7am.
  • Covering core lending and funding issues, strategy, payments, regulation, risk management, IT, marketing and more.
  • Original news and summaries of major stories from other media – ditch your newspaper subscriptions.
  • Focused on banking and finance, saving you the time spent wading through newspapers and other services.
  • With reporting from former editors and senior writers from the AFR and The Australian.
  • Configured for your phone, laptop and PC.
Free trial Banking Day
Stay Ahead. Stay Informed.
Concise. Candid. Provocative.
Get the daily banking news that matters
Banking Day – Your trusted source for independent financial insights.
Subscribe Now

Consumer lending

  • Latitude, Harvey Norman liable for interest free GO card con

Copyright © WorkDay Media 2003-2025.

Banking Day is a WorkDay Media publication

WorkDay Media Unit Trust

  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of access and use