• Contact
  • Feedback
Banking Day
Stay Ahead. Stay Informed.
Concise. Candid. Provocative.
Get the daily banking news that matters
Banking Day – Your trusted source for independent financial insights.
Subscribe Now
  • News
  • Topics
    • All Topics
    • Briefs
    • Major Banks
    • Authorised deposit-taking institutions
    • Insurance, funds and super
    • Payments, mobile & wallets
    • Consumer lending
    • Mortgages
    • Business lending
    • Finance regulation
    • Debt capital markets
    • Ratings agencies
    • Equity capital markets
    • Professional services
    • Work & career
    • Foreign news
    • Other topics
  • Free Trial
  • Subscribe
  • Resources
    • Industry events
  • About us
    • About Banking Day
    • Advertise
    • Feedback
    • Contact Banking Day
  • Search
  • Login
  • My account
    • Account settings
    • User Admin
    • Logout

Login or request a free trial

Poor disclosure lets Atradius off hook

18 June 2012 5:01PM
Credit insurer Atradius does not have to pay out a A$27 million claim to Optus over invoices unpaid at the time of the collapse of Bill Express when the latter collapsed in mid-2008, the Supreme Court of New South Wales has ruled.Inadequate disclosure by Optus to Atradius about the history of slow payments by Bill Express, as well as inadequate drafting of clauses in the insurance contract relating to a sub-agency agreement, helped persuade the judge, Robert McDougall, that the insurer does not have to pay.At the time Bill Express folded, the firm owed Optus in excess of $62 million, according to the judgement handed down earlier this month. Bill Express was selling between $5 and $6 million worth of Optus Mobile and Virgin Mobile pre-paid airtime weekly, with the commission on these sales being the major source of revenue for the firm.Bill Express had a history of late payments under the (very short term) credit allowed it by Optus. There was a lack of disclosure by Optus to Atradius over three payment arrangements made, and breached, by Bill Express between 2005 and 2007. Optus, however, did not adequately disclose this conduct to its insurer. Optus made its claim under a credit insurance policy with an indemnity cap of $30 million and a liability for 90 per cent of the loss up to a maximum of $27 million.McDougall ruled that Atradius "is entitled to avoid the policy for fraudulent non-disclosure [by Optus]" of its payment plans.

I'm a returning subscriber

*
Password reset *
Login

Request a free trial

  • Emailing you the news at 7am.
  • Covering core lending and funding issues, strategy, payments, regulation, risk management, IT, marketing and more.
  • Original news and summaries of major stories from other media – ditch your newspaper subscriptions.
  • Focused on banking and finance, saving you the time spent wading through newspapers and other services.
  • With reporting from former editors and senior writers from the AFR and The Australian.
  • Configured for your phone, laptop and PC.
Free trial Banking Day
Stay Ahead. Stay Informed.
Concise. Candid. Provocative.
Get the daily banking news that matters
Banking Day – Your trusted source for independent financial insights.
Subscribe Now

Consumer lending

  • Latitude, Harvey Norman liable for interest free GO card con

Copyright © WorkDay Media 2003-2025.

Banking Day is a WorkDay Media publication

WorkDay Media Unit Trust

  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of access and use