• Contact
  • Feedback
Banking Day
  • News
  • Topics
    • All Topics
    • Briefs
    • Major Banks
    • Authorised deposit-taking institutions
    • Insurance, funds and super
    • Payments, mobile & wallets
    • Consumer lending
    • Mortgages
    • Business lending
    • Finance regulation
    • Debt capital markets
    • Ratings agencies
    • Equity capital markets
    • Professional services
    • Work & career
    • Foreign news
    • Other topics
  • Free Trial
  • Subscribe
  • Resources
    • Industry events
  • About us
    • About Banking Day
    • Advertise
    • Feedback
    • Contact Banking Day
  • Search
  • Login
  • My account
    • Account settings
    • User Admin
    • Logout

Login or request a free trial

Regulatory rush taxing system resources, says Reserve Bank

20 September 2013 4:08PM
Financial regulators would like a tempering in the pace of regulatory reform, says the RBA in an article in its latest Bulletin.The Council of Financial Regulators "are mindful that the pace and volume of change are challenging for the financial system and regulators, and raise the potential for unintended consequences," the article said. An observation that chimes with long running industry complaints."With substantial policy development completed, there is an opportunity to focus on implementation of reforms already agreed, and pay close attention to their effectiveness," said the article.The timetable for many reforms, such as those concerning bank liquidity, stretches out to 2109, while "new work streams and policy proposals keep arising," the RBA said.The RBA also noted that "demands on regulators and financial institutions run some risk of absorbing resources that could be used for more useful risk management purposes.""There is also potential for the vast number of reforms to cut across each other and have unintended effects. "One example of the tensions in financial regulation are reform efforts to reduce counterparty risk by increasing collateralisation of banks' exposures, including through central counterparties."However, a recent Bank for International Settlements report suggests that the side-effects of doing so could run counter to achieving other high-level objectives, including reducing interconnectedness, reducing pro-cyclicality and reducing uncertainty, given the way that financial institutions are likely to respond to managing collateral."

I'm a returning subscriber

*
Password reset *
Login

Request a free trial

  • Emailing you the news at 7am.
  • Covering core lending and funding issues, strategy, payments, regulation, risk management, IT, marketing and more.
  • Original news and summaries of major stories from other media – ditch your newspaper subscriptions.
  • Focused on banking and finance, saving you the time spent wading through newspapers and other services.
  • With reporting from former editors and senior writers from the AFR and The Australian.
  • Configured for your phone, laptop and PC.
Free trial Banking Day

Consumer lending

  • Latitude, Harvey Norman liable for interest free GO card con

Copyright © WorkDay Media 2003-2025.

Banking Day is a WorkDay Media publication

WorkDay Media Unit Trust

  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of access and use